2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|05|

2014-07-12 "There is no basic data anywhere." [長年日記]

It is a continuation from yesterday.

Now, the reason why I am making the 100,000,000 person's simulator is to want to avoid make a mathematical formula.

In short, there are some persons who repeat a cycle of unmarried ->married -> divorce -> remarriage -> divorce -> remarriage.

On investigation, the population of this pattern is not small vanishingly.

We have to embed the behavior as a formula to my simulator, and I need to know statistic values before.

For example,

I have to make the followings,

- A function "divorce (N)" that means the divorce possibility, marriage N years ago.

- A function "remarriage (N)" that means the divorce possibility, divorce N years ago.

"There is no basic data nowhere."

However, if someone asks me whether I can make such functions by myself, I should answer "it is impossible for me"

It is easier for us to understand that the divorce rate is going to change easily against numbers of children, address, area, age, property.

In short, making such formulas is not only complicated but also unrealistic.

-----

Therefore "it is force".

Apply 100 million people's behavior to national censuses by force.

- Let make one couple marry enforcedly even if they have no intention of marriage.

- Let make one couple divorce enforcedly without their hope.

In addition, I make the object free (delete), whose age is more than 100 years. The calculation is troublesome.

-----

The problem is that I cannot know whether the simulator works well or not.

If it is just a compile error, it is O.K. But if the algorism is wrong (it is bug), I have to find the mistake from the output numeric.

More than 100 million data.

Who can read them?

(To be continued)