(Continuation from yesterday)

1st:"Trying to have someone's heart, using their attribute like "pretty" without specified concrete approach must be guilty, because there is at least one person except for themselves.

Ebata:"You mean that we should not have someone's love with only "pretty"."

1st:"Sengoku Nadeko is trying to have Araragi's hearts without clarifying her intention and paying much cost tactfully."

Ebata:"That's true. But a hurt-less love strategy, making someone confess their love, is homeliness."

1st:"Even if it is true, we can observe their effort or cost to "make someone confess their love" can't we?"

Ebata:"..."

1st:"Trying to have someone's heart, ignoring his/her existence, heart and feeling, is a faithless realization against all human being."

Ebata:"Sure.."

1st:"Sengoku Nadeko, is just pretty, but she tries to have Araragi's heart without any effort and pain. So we can condemn her guilty because of her bad faith.

And the first daughter reasserted,

1st:"Araraki Tsukihi and Oshino Shinobu have already dropped an advance hint, with saying "You are lucky, because you are pretty as it happens.""

Ebata:"....I got it."

-----

The conclusion.

I argue that Sengoku Nadeko is not guilty, because her "pretty" is just one of her attribute of a talent, so it is illogic to blame her for the reason of her "pretty".

In opposition to my argument, the first daughter claims that Sengoku Nadeko is guilty, because she doesn't consider nature of love at all. Love is a kind of collaborative activity. Any trying to have someone's heart without any effort is faithless. Therefore, Sengoku Nadeko should be blamed for her bad faith.

It followed that the first daughter argued me down excellently.