2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|05|

2015-10-01 "If you destroy my logic, I think that you are in trouble as an author of the books ?" [長年日記]

Patented innovation is basically the innovation of technology.

Contrary to our expectation, according to the interpretation of patent law,

"The innovators don't have to explain the mechanical function logically"

is permitted.

The technology like "though I don't know the function, it works well" is going to be patented.

Even if the low possibilities, but the constant rate of repeatability is observed, Patent office in Japan allows the patent.

I like the realistic thought of patent law.

I believe that this is that "to cover technical idea".

"No explanation of technical functions, no value of the innovation." is absolutely nonsense, I think.

And now, for something completely different.

-----

When I checked the titles of book that include "segmented diet" from Amazon site, I could find that there are 756 books in Japan.

This time, I concluded that "segmented diet is impossible logically" in my column of this month.

And in the columns I wrote,

"Please let me know if you have a logical explanation about "success to segmented diet". I can change my thought within 3 seconds."

So I am strongly expecting that at lease one person of the 756 authors gives me a contact.

-----

"Is the contact coming? "

"If you destroy my logic, I think that you are in trouble as an author of the books ?"

(To be continued)