Last weekend, I went with my senior daughter about rote learning of world history.

I don't think that the rote learning of world chronological table is a study of history. So I think we should make less effort for the minimum counts.

The years of world history are just landmarks to understand the flow of the history.

-----

Well, it is a hard work for my age.

I cannot learn many historical events by heart.

Without backgrounds of history, historical person's characters, and political styles or religions in the period, I cannot leave the event in my brain.

But if I choose this way, I need more than one hour for each historical event.

The day of an entrance examination is going away before the completion.

-----

In order to study several subjects dynamically and massively at the same time,

"The brain of teenager is needed absolutely"

I could understand the fact deeply.

-----

"Do you think the above is my argument ?"

I am sorry but I believe that all of the above are just excuses of educators or guardians, who

have no intention to make a study of lecture technology for life, or

have no intention to invent new methods.

(To be continued)