(Continuation from yesterday)

Above all, I think that the economic effectiveness is enormous.

Even if we don't have any individuality and creativity and live a life aimlessly , we are enormous engines to make the economy move

Of course, it is a different story whether happiness or not.

For example, terrorist explosions, huge disaster, and care of the aged, they can stimulate the economy.

-----

I wrote the above, however, I, myself think that "this is a fast-food logic and have problems with them".

I know well that it is impossible to resolve them with this light thinking processes.

However, at least, I think that it might be an idea doesn't need the religion of doctrine of "all of life is worth equally".

-----

Far away from the original topic.

What I want to say,

"Watching sports" is a content that is not be established by only creators of the sport contents.

Any creation generates the "value" when it is consumed.

The ability to enjoy "watching sports" is to give the value to the creation, and everyone who who enjoy the "sports" is an engine turning the economy.

Even if I cannot do anything what I want by aging, and I become no longer making anything,

If I have even the ability to enjoy the content, I have a "value" of "useful for someone".

I believe that, even if everybody denies this my logic.

-----

For now, I think that the ability is more valuable than more than one hundred patent applications of mine(my junior said),