(Continuation from yesterday)

Therefore, the reason I thought "this minister has already been broken" is that I judged "this computer system has already broken".

-----

Even if he is the minster who is corresponding to the big and terrible earthquake in 2011,

he should have done the following tasks,

thorough field investigation

understanding the enoumous numbers of the damage and the analsis based ont eh numbers,

planning recovery program logically, and

getting budget to realize above task and avoid conflicting of interest,

Tha means, he must be a super-computer with enoumous drive units

and,

even if he were the super-computer, that executes the above four tasks,

"he could not have made the thoughtless phrase absolutely"

In other words, the super computer could not execute the given tasks correctly

"Broken Super Computer", that could not fulfill the primary duty.

This is my understanding about him.

I don't blame and criticize any "broken object".

Even if the computer system has broken, it is enough to be broken out of the main system (and it had already finished by the prime minister, as a main computer system)

Even if he is a broken computer, it will work well, based on new OS, software or other missions.

However, from the view of his previous works, I am afraid that it is not software problem, but hardware drawback( qualification in himself). "Scrap it" might be better.