(Continuation from yesterday)

"Unless the Pythagorean theorem exists, the world is moving". I am afraid, but this is true.

(Or, there might be a logic that it is no problem to exist some few experts )

In much the same way, the world that no ancient writing, no world history, no English, and no Japanese and no books that are written by a simple-minded author couple, is also moving.

Extremely speaking, "learning" or "studying" is not indispensability for the world.

-----

However I think the world without "learning" or "studying" is not good for "ecology".

It looks "it is tremendous inefficient" for me.

Because I think that the supreme goal of "learning" or "studying" is conversation (or communication).

Basically,

Numbers, math. and science are for conversations with objects,

Ancient writing and history are for conversations with past era and people,

English is for conversations with people who use different language each other,

Japanese is for conversations with people who want to convey the detailed intentions.

The method how to understand the world without conversations is unique.

It is "violence".

The society made by just "violence" is, obviously, wasting tremendous resource(including human life), and far from unassured daily life.

-----

There might be almost same between blindness of "Pythagorean theorem" and "auxiliary verb conjugation of ancient writing".

Maybe, both are important, and at the same time we don't care them at all.

However if we build against "learning" or "studying", it means that we will reject a conversation with the world.

"It is insufficient and gives us unassured daily life", if this Ebata's assumption is true,

Knowing many things in many field, and keeping them in our mind, are

good methods to put daily life at our ease

might be true,

Well, it might not be true, however.