(Continuation from yesterday)

Among them, especially what I was shocked is

- Tel Aviv Airport Shooting case

In 1972, three Japanese terrorists shot automatic rifles at the terminal at Tel Aviv 's Lot Airport in Israel.

they killed 24 civilians who were at the terminal, give injuries to over 100 people.

- Dhaka JAL Hijack case

A hijack case that the criminal requested the release of nine terrorists who were serving and detained in Japan and 1.6 billion yen.

The Government of Japan issued "super legal measures" and responded to the release of terrorists.

I do not know what kinds of brain circuit can create a foolish idea of "killing irrelevant civilians and fulfilling the revolution", and there is no plan to make an effort to understand in the future.

-----

I searched quite seriously the legal basis of "super legal measures" this weekend, of course, there is not such a thing (if it is, it becomes self-denial of a legalist state),

Based on the "abuse of administrative rights", if someone gets a lawsuit (if they were bereaved of the victims of terrorism, there would have a right of it), the Supreme Court is making a judgment that it is not "unconstitutional". I was looking for a sentence like that, but unfortunately I have not found it.

(If you know, please let me know)

(To be continued)