2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|05|

2018-04-20 "I can lick the examiner's soles of the feet" [長年日記]

(Continuation from yesterday)

Though my written opinion and amendment procedures, I'm doing something to the examiner. If I am going to get patent rights of my invention, I can say that

"I can lick the examiner's soles of the feet"

I have worked seriously about the patent specification, as a public documents",

according to the administrative agencies and the orders of the law, without ever going against it,

-----

If the administrative agency himself bends the rules himself,

How awkward I am to continue to "lick the examiner's soles of the feet"?

My tears came into my eyes.

-----

I don't want to say

"Anyone who ordered falsification of the public sentence, or executed it with depending on the power, does "harakiri" in front of their office building."

I just claim that

Not "falsification" but "compensation" or "correction" based on the administrative law, they should open the public document to people,

and

I also just request them to

"write the reason for the "compensation" or "correction" correctly, for example, "the abuse of power, including the family"

-----

If it is true.