(Continuation from yesterday)

When I look it up on the net, I will have plenty of information about "direct burial".

The reason why people can choose "direct burial",

(1) Economic circumstances (there is no money)

(2) Changes in the view of religion (I do not have to call a monk as there is no faith in particular)

(3) Dilution of human relations (Since there is no participant, it is not necessary to do a funeral)

And, each is a good reason.

In my case, it is (2) (3).

As in (1), money may be gone, even if I have money, I will recommend going an overseas trip and learning a language and culture of the country with the money for my family

Many people in the city center seems to choose "direct burial". Because urban areas tend to avoid such "disturbance".

Conversely, in rural areas it will be hard to do "direct burial". There are complaints from neighbors as well as relatives.

"Do not something" may require the same or even more energy than "doing something".

Even if I am alone, I will accept a challenge to a quarrel. However in this case, the target will not be me but my "survivor".

-----

All these stories are acknowledged by family members - although conditional.

My family has ordered me that "Make it clear by handwriting for our safety" (Because it will annoy me, I will tell them that digitally sign for blogs in the last few days, is enough.

In the end of the sentence, I will add the following sentences.

"The reason I decided not to do my a funeral, is YOU, who annoys my family. I don't want you to come to me"

"After reading this, go away"

(To be continued)