(Continuation from yesterday)

I do not think such "people who can not realize it" are "lazy" or "irresponsible".

This is simply a matter of "environment."

Dealing with the same line, for people who can use e-mail for tomorrow's eating (people who always use e-mail at work everyday) and people who rarely use cell phones, is

"violence"

It is no exaggeration to say.

-----

However, on the other hand, from my viewpoint, works that do not use IT like e-mails, are "unimaginably inefficient".

Inefficiency conference. for example "do not distribute agenda beforehand", "do not contact the issue in advance by e-mail", "do not issue a reminder of the meeting" and "do not share decisions with e-mail etc." are

for me,

"violence"

It is also no exaggeration to say.

Now I am feeling to be divided into two, between "works (in company) that use IT to the bone's mind, and "works desperately that lack IT literacy (Neighborhood Association)"

-----

The "theory" like this should be developed on the side of the weak.

I don't have to receive unnecessary criticism.

But this time, I do not be afraid of criticism and I would like to develop "theory" from my point of view of the stronger

"It can not be helped that elderly people do not have IT literacy because they were no chance to get IT education".

I'd like to validate whether the "theory" is true or not.

-----

As a premise, I (Tomoichi Ebata) has not received "IT literacy education" from kindergarten to graduate school graduation. First of all, please remember this.

(To be continued)