Recently, a man who has guide dogs, may get together with the subway of commuters.

Of course, only I am aware of it.

When I find that person, I will be in a mode of guard person.

Once I approached the automatic ticket gate for exit exclusively, I may have led to another ticket gate.

Well, looking at such a scene, I come to think that

"If you are seriously thinking about AI robots and others, you can make a robot of guide dogs instead of AIBO."

-----

The story of this neighborhood is not a story about cost, but I know that it will become a more "miserable" story.

In Japan, against the development of automatic vacuum cleaner,

"What happens if the vacuum cleaner hits the altar, candles (candles) collapse, and it makes a fire?"

It was too famous that the development was stopped by the logic.

Now, Japanese companies are also developing automatic cleaning vacuum cleaners.

Of course, the "candle (candle)" problem has not been solved.

Regarding the development of the guide dog robot, it is not difficult to imagine that this reason is explicitly working.

When an accident occurs, the responsibility of the accident can be forced to "dog" and "the user". It is not necessary for us to forcibly develop and infringe risks.

-----

Overseas, a fatal accident has occurred in an experiment of an automated driving car.

However, an automated driving car may make fatal accidents to "zero as much" in the future.

In order to be "zero as much", it is necessary to prepare to kill some people.

If you think seriously to take the AI robot, the preparation is necessary.

-----

The government withdrew the "poor" budget that is included in AI and robot development,

Manufacturers and ventures will be saved if they contributed as insurance against the damage of the experiment -

There are no politicians or officials able to think like that.