(Continuation from yesterday)

I have consistently supported the "single cosmology" so far.

This is because "Multiple (Parallel) Cosmology" ignores the problem of total energy.

If infinite number of universe exist in parallel, there was infinite energy at the beginning of the universe.

Of course, animations should not care of this "infinite energy" at the beginning of the universe.

Because any animations are fiction.

-----

However, in my mind, the absolute fact "Big Bang" stands here.

"Big Bang" is neither "fiction" nor "hypothesis", it is "fact" already verified in mathematics (calculation), astronomy (observation) and physics (logic) (*).

(*) Simon Singh :Big Bang: The Most Important Scientific Discovery of All Time and Why You Need to Know About It

The "fact" is, for example, it is neither "fiction" nor "hypothesis" in the world of "Logically we could make an atomic bomb" (before 1945), "facts" of the world (after 1945) that "we can explode the atomic bomb in reality".

And, "Big Bang" assumes "finite energy" at the beginning.

However, since "multi-dimensional space" has to assume infinite energy. So from my point of view, "Multiple Universe" seems to be "extreme opportunism"

-----

Until now, in fact, it is just my quibble.

Subjectively, I do not like the idea that "I am not only "here" but "somewhere" " and "infinite number of myself are everywhere".

I, who "am not only "here" but "somewhere", am

cool, intelligent, popular, having unknown super-power, and happy

I feel uncomfortable about the above "extreme opportunism" configurations.

I, who "am not only "here" but "somewhere" am

ugly, stupid, disliked, no strength, and just being at the pole of misfortune,

If you do not arrange such configurations equally, I feel "unfair".

Of course, "paralell world fantasy" is fun content as fiction.

However, compared with the content created in the tight bound of "time paradox" like "Steins;Gate / Zero", I come to think

"They are in a different class"

(To be continued)