(Continuation from yesterday)

However, from the viewpoint, "economics" and "commerce" should be science subjects absolutely.

"Nomology" is also included in science subjects, because this study needs the assemble of logics through an accumulation of judicial precedents.

Thinking the technology of machine translation, I think "language" and "literature" are also science even if using strong-arm methods.

-----

So I sometimes think that we do not need the frameworks of literature and science.

Each faculty may decide the subjects of the exam from the view of their necessary subjects in the education process.

This is just my opinion, but IT(Information Technology) should have a responsibility to the reason of collapsing frameworks.

-----

I think that many people think the same.

Especially, for teachers of 'psychology' department, I am afraid that teaching "statistics" from scratch is very hard.

If the students have already learned the knowledge and method of "statistics" in high school program, that will make them easier.

------

However, I think that the reason why we cannot realize it, is "it will confuse the front of high school education"

Or, the front will be accused of the blame of "high school is not prep-school for college".

Above all, the purpose of high school is not a method to pass a college, but to get comprehensive higher learning.

In the way, we cannot against the logic that even the division between literature and science is out of the philosophy.

-----

So, I think that the present thought of the framework is a "result of the compromise".

Therefore, the setting of the anime "we are not good at studying" has been established.