(Continuation from yesterday)

However, what I felt really troubled at the study sessions held at the dormitory was their "sorry writing ability".

Since I was a science student, I knew well the necessity of representing the concept with figures and numbers. The badness of the dormitory's presentation was hopeless.

A summary statement in my report form that explains things in a complete and logical way, was just criticized as

"Easy Schemeism"

Now I can say

"Your head is too bad to summarize your claim and explain it to others"

However at the time, I could not know which one is correct.

Now there is no doubt of their ignorance.

-----

I will consider that at the time of the self-governing dormitory, the reason of this "innocent writing" passed through, was the influence of "the translation of the original book" by philosophers and thinkers.

"Unreasonable writing" is right --- at the bottom of this foolish thought, I think there are two possibilities.

(1)There is no technical writing (logical writing) ability at all

(2)If it is described in the above method (1), the shallowness of the bottom of their idea is easily exposed

Anyway, I think I was really wise. Because I noticed that I was being stunned with such things, and I left the room soon. even I was a leader of the dormitory.

In the above discussion in the dormitory, whenever I heard a quote from a thinker or philosopher they abuse, I thought

"Are you really talking after understanding the contents of this original book?"

(To be continued)