There has been a notification of the House of Councilors election, and election activity has become active, however, I feel that

"Always, what I'm saying is too much about"

I can not judge the content of the speech without mentioning "policy" as a set of "financial resources".

As the following extreme example,

"I emphasize child care. Instead, elderly care is cut off. "

If they say that, it is convinced with that.

I wrote a lot about that story here, so I hope you can read it.

-----

Set is aside,

I realized "I really didn't know the "numbers" about Japan" before I was in charge of this series,

I can say that I am confident that I can say that Japan's GDP, tax revenue, budget ratio, population (workers, children, elderly people), etc. easily.

"If you look at the whole "100", this issue will be about this"

The following is not a very good illustration, however, I can also look at

"A few billions of yen, as a whole, is, like "a small change" that child runs to a candy store"

However, our life itself is based on a micro economy, but considering our future, we also need a macro point of view.

-----

Why don't they tell us the sense of the scale of the tax system or population "numbers" in school education?

I know that "the state controls education" is a fact, but I can not say that it is "malicious."

But, I feel bottomless malicious that they don't tell children the "numbers".

If we know the scale of this "number", it is very inconvenient for policymakers (including candidates).

(To be continued)