Post-law and retrospective law are not allowed in a rule-of-law state.

The post-mortem / retrospective law is to create a law later and add a penalty retroactively.

If we do this by law, nobody will know what will later become "crime".

There are so many crimes in the world that can not be forgiven emotionally, morally and humanely.

Nevertheless, the rule of law is that "you cannot judge a person unless it is based on the law, not the emotions, thoughts, or personal beliefs."

To continue enacting laws to prevent future crimes, based on the lament, anger and sadness of many people.

This is the fate and pride of the people of the rule of law.

-----

Even if you don't talk about the "rule of law", it is "irrational" to judge past cases based on current judgment criteria.

For example, physical punishment and power harassment in the educational setting were called "love whip" and sexual harassment was called "communication."

However we can say, "So what?" coldy.

That means,

Regardless of past common sense or social wisdom, current corporal punishment, abuse, power harassment, and sexual harassment are judged solely by current common sense and social wisdom.

We don't care anything, no matter who claims what based on past values

Therefore, no matter how tedious we are, we must always catch up our current common sense and justice, and keep changing ourselves

-----

It keeps changing every day (or every hour if you are bad) that virus infections without treatment and social responses.

No one could have imagined this two weeks ago.

As I write my diary now, all over the world

The number of infected people increases every 100,000 people every day,

Every day, a few percent die

Triage (abandoning patients with low chance of survival) has begun in the field

A situation like "I have a nightmare" is developing in real time all over the world.

-----

Two weeks ago, who envisioned this "nightmare"? ―― To be clear, I can assert that "nobody was there"

Of course, me too.

Two weeks ago, everyone would have thought "in April."

You would normally expect to have an entrance ceremony, an entrance ceremony, a transfer, a meeting, and a busy daily life.

However, we are now stunned by the worst April in human history.

And at the moment, there is no future on the convergence of this disaster.

-----

In fact, I myself wrote a diary of a packed ski resort on the middle of March (March 21).

And no one has blamed my solo ski diary for "the day I published that diary".

Of course, I thought that if I was a solo skier, I wouldn't have any of the three conditions (*), but the fact is trun that I went out with a loose feeling.

(*) A generic term for the three elements of "closed", "dense" and "close"

Of course, some people may come to blame me "now," however in "now," it does not help anything.

-----

At the beginning of March, it was not clear whether or not the "avoidance of three conditions", which is now common sense, would be effective.

Even in mid-March, I think the image was about the effort target.

So, I am going to ask you,

"If anyone could logically criticize my trip to solo ski on March 21, I would like you to argue with me."

I would like you to provide a logical explanation of what was wrong with my actions based on the facts as of March 21.

Of course, I will try my best to refute based on the facts of the March 21 stage.

What is important here is that "criticism from the future beyond March 21", that is, "criticism citing the current situation will not be accepted."

-----

Conversely,

At the present, it makes clear that we can't control the number of infected people, and we know that people who have high fever of 38 degrees or more for almost two weeks, and people wandering about life and death in hell-like pain that cannot breathe on his own,

Nevertheless,

College students hugging at the station platform and talking loudly,

Adults at a pub, face-to-face, drunk, spitting, and swearing by her boss

"You can beat them down"

I think that.