The other day I was at the library reading a novel about a hacker who tries to hack into the FBI or the CIA, but I failed to read it in the middle of the book.

"Too little study"

I was afraid that it was so poorly written.

"Maybe there's a business calculation that says, "If I don't make this level of content, my readers won't follow me", however I immediately rejected such a good-faith interpretation of mine.

That kind of detail-related knowledge inevitably "shows up between the lines". No matter how much they try to suppress it, I can still see it.

-----

There are no "violence" or "guns" or "abduction" or "kidnapping" or "kidnapping" in real life cyber attacks.

If you make a movie about a real-life cyber attack,

"An attacker facing the PC and operating 20 or so consoles spread out on the display at the same time, working for about 20 hours on end."

It will be a boring, boring movie.

-----

Cyber attacks, of course, put the defender at a tremendous disadvantage against the attacker.

There's a lot of talk about it, but it's all over if you're targeted.

An attacker can have multiple people attacking at any given time with plenty of time and resources, however, the defenders must continue to respond in one place, 24 hours a day, without a break.

That's why I tried to file a patent application called "Automatic Retaliation System", however I was stopped.

(To be continued)