I am Ebata, the official "violent device" of the Ebata family.
Examples of violent devices include,
(1) I once went to the principal's office of a school to knock him down, or rather, to discuss the matter with him.
(2) Once, at a pension center, I disputed the responsibility of the government office for an incomplete document and had the incomplete document accepted.
(3) I have forced a customer to complete the cancellation and contract of a smartphone by setting a time limit for the customer to respond to a dishonest response.
-----
In each case, the problem was a family member other than myself, but the parties involved were restless, reading their phones or books while I was fighting with them at the counter.
Before I joined the problem,
"If my father comes, he will kill you.
I heard that she said that.
-----
In my case, the following are not customer harassment.
(1) I list the case process chronologically in the text.
(2) Properly separate the responsibility for the incident (including our side).
(3) Then, both parties confirm the issues in the case.
(4) After including (1) through (3) above, summarize which is unreasonable and disadvantageous in light of the rules, the law, and common sense (social common sense).
Thus, after clarifying the background and issues,
(5) Find a compromise point for both sides, demand the necessary response, and inform the other side of the reaction (x retaliation) measures we are prepared to take.
(6) If the other party does not take action within the specified period, the response (x retaliation) is executed "100%".
I think I have been able to use my studies at the law seminar (which I attended at my own expense) in this approach.
I would not say, 'There is no such thing as useless study in this world,' I think, 'indeed, that would be a lie.
But I feel that 'what I have studied is often helpful.
-----
Daughter: "You're good at making things impossible, aren't you, Dad?
Ebata: "That is not true. I am only making a statement based on the "law" and "rules. I am not doing anything more or less than that.
I genuinely believe that.
-----
I know many people may not accept this, but I usually think.
"How to use the law" is like "mathematical proofs" or "program algorithms."