When I am looked blank, I always keep thinking something. Especially when I read a book, I am annoyed to be interrupted for salute.

As for me, I don't need your formal salute. I never have feeling of unhappiness without your salute.

But my unhappy feeling is going to be activated easily by other reasons.

-----

From the viewpoint of me,

I feel shrinking back when I come to think that "there are some persons who think "no salute is no polite".

Thought I don't care being scolded by someone at all, I become in trouble if the trouble spread out to my tasks.

Though I think that salute is not important, I always go to someone for salute as a precautionary measure.

So I am afraid that someone might misunderstand that Ebata-san feels polite salute is important. Next, the person who don't think that polite salute is important will come to me for salute,

The count of persons who was interrupted by salutes and don’t like the polite salute, is not going to be reduced. So finally, the negative feedback will continue.

(To be continued)

I think that my presentation and speech are not good but painless at least.

But it might be just me that I think that.

I want to stop talking about that any more, because of this column.

-----

The other day, I was asked out an bridal party for the first time in 20 years.

"This 20 years" can show my "despairing personal connections".

I pretened to be tough .... not just think that this is a sort of Win-Win relationship.

I hate "unenjoyable speech" very much beyond my description at the party.

It is too difficult to express my feeling, however I dare to try saying,

"A nightmare that I am enforced to watch the soap opera "Demons are all around" during dinner time."

I hope that you can understand my miserable mind.

(To be continued)

This weekend, I made a simulator of "ultra-simple" U.S. presidential election (that needed less than two hours).

I have no brain and time to come to think a mathematization, I always use enforcement measures for some problems.

This time, I enforced the calculation of

voting for four hundred million people in the U.S.

However, this calculation seems to be heavy for my computer, it is needed about five seconds per one election.

Even if the five seconds are needed, the performance is more that ten thousand times than a super-computer whose cost was a hundred million yen in the 1970's

I think that "I am really alive in good time". and I grateful for all efforts of computer engineers in the world.

(To be continued)

I heard that there is a workshop whose name is "how to make an innovation".

I hope I will take the workshop.

The followings are my attentions.

(1)Is the speaker of workshop, an experienced worker who had made "an innovation" before, as a matter of course ?

(2)Did he/she make enormous counts of "innovation" before, enough to make "recipes" of the the innovations ?

(3)Don't tell me that he/she will just introduce the results of analyses or study of others innovation, and will enforce a silly workshop.

From the malicious viewpoints, I will observe the speaker, not the workshop.

-----

In my case, I think I can give you workshops whose title "how to make patent application with cutting corner", or "how to make invention(x innovation) as a output quota". Please contact me ASAP.

On the other hand, I will run away soon, if I am asked a workshop whose title is "how to make innovative invention" or "how to make money by patent right"

-----

Well, who will give me an excellent innovative method of "how to make an innovation" ?

At the school trip destination, I was a student who first slept asleep at bedtime.

I did not dislike the event that makes noise at night, and I didn't want to pretend to be an adult. I just dislike "sleep deprivation"

I wanted to enjoy the temple and the landscape without nausea and headache - that's all.

My behavior was demonstrated at skiing events with college colleagues, and my only skiing memory was skiing.

That's aside.

-----

The other day, my company's research presentation was held at a laboratory in Ibaraki prefecture.

I was entering the venue for the setup of the demonstration system the day before.

As I needed to explain the system the next day, I stayed at a local business hotel at that night.

Even after entering the business hotel, troublesome projects were included in the company's mailbox. In order to clear up the matter, I was sending phone calls and e-mails.

-----

Finally, after clearing them, I pulled out my home PC (desktop) from the travel suitcase and began assembling the system on the desk of the hotel.

It was because my home PC was absolutely necessary to make a simulation of my hobby and to draw a drawing of a column.

The problem is "display", however, recently most business hotels has a television with digital / analog terminal for PC, and it can be used as a display.

At The hotel we stayed at this time, the TV had a terminal for PC properly. even it was small size.

However,

Neither digital terminal nor analog terminal could display at all.

(To be continued)

I have been serializing the column for more than a year about "work style reform", and I am confident that I am doing a miserable way of working.

If we really want to reform our way of working,

(1) Do not challenge new technologies and methods

(2) Do not respond to unreasonable requests

(3) Do not keep the delivery date (just target)

(4) Norm is within the range that can be achieved

I think that this is possible if we consider the above as a social convention in Japan.

Is this the "socialist revolution" ?

-----

I'm not familiar with the recent socialist countries, however, I know that

A huge nation in the far north has failed to spectacularly as a result of 70 years of experimentation

The other giant nation has a dynamic economic development in a direction (market economy, introduction of competition principle) that is different from the philosophy of socialism.

-If the Second Cultural Revolution breaks out, about 99% of the people will be purged.

A socialist country on the north side of the peninsula that is ruining the idea of socialism, because the powers are inherited by blood. The country continue to bother neighbor countries by the theory of the weak.

-----

As far as I know, the state currently advocating a socialist country does not seem to be a country that can talk about "work style reform".

In other words, the “socialist revolution” is not the answer to "work style reform".

-----

As you may know, I am the leader of the Japanese stagnation party.

It may be the time to seriously think about the “stagnation revolution”.

One of the topics of this presidential election,

"Just by analyzing the 'GOOD' button on a social network, you can learn about a person's personality."

You can read explanatory those articles in various places.

In my case, by analyzing all of the Twitter timelines of people who have disrespected my column, I would judge the person as follows,

"She/He counts for nothing"

and, I could find relief.

This is a pretty good way to do it, and I recommend it to you.

Many of the people who have disrespected my column have been, brilliantly, 'a frivolity that can easily be put into the tone of the author's argument' or "Incompetence that cannot explain things with logic".

However, on the other hand, although it is a rare case, she/he was also an "observer who grasps the event based on his own policy" with intelligences based on their self-assertions".

I can "lower the tame" in both opposite directions.

-----

This is the same as analyzing the "GOOD" button on a social network.

And it's one of the reasons I've decided not to use all social networking sites, including Twitter and Facebook.

"Who likes to expose their personalities to the world?"

I think that.

-----

I realized the following when I was in the middle of writing this diary.

"I am the one who publishes a daily diary and releases a monthly column, and I am the one who is exposing my personality to the world"

I've come to the obvious fact that if I don't want my personality to be known, I should shut down my diary and column first.

I wrote a previous column about Non-Fungible Token (NFT).

In that column, I outlined the results of a "technical review of the content of the NFT as explained on YouTube.

By the way, I also added a message saying, 'If I misunderstand them, please let me know'.

-----

After the column was released, I checked YouTube again and found that all the content I referred to had been removed.

Well,

"Comment: "Don't be stupid."

They may be scared when they read the lines.

Rather, they might resent me for 'humiliating' them.

However, I just said that the technical explanation of NFT is wrong, not that I am denying NFT itself.

I don't think that "the world where NFTs are used as currency will never come".

If I had to describe this feeling in one word, it would be,

"I don't care what the future holds for NFT"

-----

If someone can make money with NFT and be happy, I will honestly say "Congratulations".

In addition, if no one loses money and becomes unhappy with NFT, I will honestly say "it is great".

Anyway,

My understanding of NFT is that of a native who was shown coins and paper money in an uncivilized land without concept of currency.

I was astonished to learn in yesterday's news that the former Unification Church, formerly known as the Unification Church, is conducting 'planned production of adopted children'.

It is 'horrifying' (or 'abhorrent') to even talk about this, so please see this article.

Well, the following phrases should suffice.

=====

The handbook that provided guidelines for the life of faith also recommended a pregnancy with the intention of giving the child up for adoption, stating, "It is most desirable to make the promise of adoption before the dedicatee's pregnancy".

======

In response to this news, the former Unification Church said,

"No money was given or received in connection with the adoption"

When I heard the comment,

"Of course, you idiot. If you are giving and receiving money with this crazy adoption, you are the "real devil"!"

I shouted in front of the TV.

-----

I am overwhelmingly in favor of the use of the adoption system.

If a parent does not have the financial resources to raise a child, or if a child is at risk of being abused by an adult who is not qualified to raise the child, being cared for by an adult who meets those conditions is significant in and of itself.

More important, however, is,

"In the best interest of the child, it must be absolutely necessary"

The former Unification Church interprets this as meaning that "making a child 'for adoption purposes' for the sake of doctrine" is "especially necessary for the benefit of the child.

There is not one millimeter of "the free will of the child (or human being)" or "dignity for the child" -- there is simply "blind obedience to a doctrine that stops thinking".

Can someone please tell me what other word I can use to describe this other than 'self-righteousness'?

Above all, the sensibility to think this is "normal" is frightening from the bottom of my heart.

-----

I believe that adoption is about enduring and overcoming one's own pain and sorrow for the "sake of the child's happiness.

Therefore, it is so obvious that it is ridiculous to talk about the need to promote this system while at the same time being mindful of its operation to maximize the "happiness of the child".

They can't help but notice the bizarreness of the doctrine of 'planning for adoption when the child does not exist' -- I think this cult that creates such people is 'still scary'.

-----

Furthermore, I am not willing to forgive this organization and all of the people who support/ have supported this organization even one millimeter in the future.

And I have my own reasons for not allowing this group (I will tell you about them eventually).

Therefore, I will continue to abuse them with "the greatest 'vulgar' expression imaginable.

-----

Finally, I would like to tell 'you' to have criticized the contents of my diary with my name 'explicitly' as "vulgar".

I continue to write with a certain amount of determination (and risk) (in fact, that organization is really "dangerous").

It is natural for you to complain with my description, and I am not going to complain to you (although I am uncomfortable) -- but I am not going to stop talking about this matter (formerly known as the Unification Church).

I am currently working on a paper in English.

I also use a translation engine, but it is off-putting.

I have a strong sense of "this is not the expression ( of English) I use," and it's causing me a lot of stress.

The sentence structure is also "not in this word order."

It is as if what I want to say does not emerge from the translation engine's English.

I think the translation engine is using some strange rhetoric.

I can't read if it uses inverted or emphatic constructions.

"What should I do by mass-producing English sentences I can't read?"

I thought like that.

Because I am the one who has to read the English sentences again and again in the world.

If it's terrible, no one but me and the reviewer may read it. It does.

I don't want to be the one who later goes, 'What the hell is this guy writing?' And I don't want to go through hell with my head in my hands.

-----

I have been submitting in English for the past couple of years.

There is no rhetoric, and the English are probably about the key sentences + α of a junior high school student.

But strangely enough, this English has "passed".

The reviewers like the direct expression without any adaptation, room for deception, and discovery.

I am lucky, or they are not interested in my content.