The old day, the media had a implied contract between the power, like

"they don't care of politician's zipper moral"

and they hesitated dealing with politician's sexual scandal as a implied rule.

-----

You know, premarital sex, comarital sex and marital infidelity are not penal offense(principle of free love)

(There was "criminal conversation" before the WW2. The law was abolished after the WW2)

Of course, I know that many people feel that they are immoral and irremissible.

But the persons who can ask for compensation against premarital sex, comarital sex and marital infidelity are only victims, for example spouses, affianced, family in law.

Even if we blame for the unfaithfulness, no influence will happen against the person in the legal sense of the term.

Beyond that, politicians have power.

At that age, it was terrible difficult for ordinal people to rip from their platform.

-----

At the present, I don't know how the implied rule is managed, however,

(Step 1) Enormous flaming messages happen on the Internet.

(Step 2)The medias start blaming with using the flaming messages.

(Step 3)After that, the hostile forces(opposition parties, civic association) begin to drive out the person with using the above actions.

The above pattern seems to be usual these days.

(To be continued)